Stress-testing the OECD's Hormuz scenario with 5,000 Monte Carlo simulations and 124 structural coupling rules.
The OECD's 2026 outlook flagged two risks for Italy: energy shock sensitivity and refinancing risk on its 137% debt-to-GDP. But the report addressed them with a single-point forecast of 0.6% growth. No ranges. No probabilities. No structural interaction modelling.
So I configured an energy shock scenario: sustained $110/barrel oil for four years, and ran it through WorldSim's Monte Carlo engine.
GDP per capita drops 4.7% by 2035 on the P50 median path, comparable to the impact of the 2008 financial crisis. Nearly 72% of simulated futures experience structural stress. Only 12% show genuine improvement.
The coupling rules reveal the cascade: energy costs feed into inflation, inflation feeds into interest rates, interest rates feed into debt servicing costs, and the fiscal space that Italy needs to respond to the shock evaporates.
The cost of living domain is the weakest structural card. Inflation rises sharply. Electricity and petrol prices cascade through the economy. The Fuel Pressure coupling rule fires, pushing transport and logistics costs into every sector.
Italy's fiscal position means it cannot subsidise its way through the shock like it did during COVID. The debt dynamics are working against every policy response.
Single-point forecasts miss this entirely. The OECD says 0.6% growth. The P50 says decline. The P10 tail says severe contraction. The P90 says recovery is possible but requires everything to go right simultaneously.
The range is what matters. And the range for Italy under sustained energy pressure is wide, asymmetric, and skewed negative.
The complete analysis includes all charts, Monte Carlo distributions, coupling rule triggers, and the energy shock configuration.
Read on Substack →Simulate Italy under your own energy shock conditions, or try any of 195 countries. See the full probability distribution.
Try WorldSim →Sources